You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Does Bradford's Law of Scattering predict the size of the literature in Cochrane Reviews?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the Medical Library Association, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.3163/1536-5050.100.2.013 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charlotte E Nash-Stewart, Lisa M Kruesi, Chris B Del Mar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Singapore | 1 | 25% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 25% |
| Ireland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 87 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 24% |
| Librarian | 7 | 8% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 19% |
| Unknown | 29 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 24% |
| Unknown | 34 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2012.
All research outputs
#13,367,517
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Medical Library Association
#508
of 886 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,386
of 160,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Medical Library Association
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 886 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.