↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Autogenic Training on General Improvement in Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
Title
Effect of Autogenic Training on General Improvement in Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Published in
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, December 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10484-009-9125-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masae Shinozaki, Motoyori Kanazawa, Michiko Kano, Yuka Endo, Naoki Nakaya, Michio Hongo, Shin Fukudo

Abstract

Autogenic training (AT) is a useful and comprehensive relaxation technique. However, no studies have investigated the effects of AT on irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). In this study we tested the hypothesis that AT improves symptoms of IBS. Twenty-one patients with IBS were randomly assigned to AT (n = 11, 5 male, 6 female) or control therapy (n = 10, 5 male, 5 female). AT patients were trained intensively, while the control therapy consisted of discussions about patients' meal habits and life styles. All patients answered a question related to adequate relief (AR) of IBS symptoms and four questionnaires: Self-induced IBS Questionnaire (SIBSQ), Self-reported Depression Scale (SDS), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), and Medical Outcome Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36). The proportion of AR in the last AT session in the AT group (9/11, 81.8%) was significantly higher than that in the controls (3/10, 30.0%, Chi-square test, p = 0.048). Two subscales of the SF-36, i.e., social functioning and bodily pain, were significantly improved in the AT group (p < 0.05) as compared to the control group. Role emotional (p = 0.051) and general health (p = 0.068) showed a tendency for improvement in the AT group. AT may be useful in the treatment of IBS by enhancing self-control.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 134 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 29 21%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Master 14 10%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 29 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 29%
Psychology 33 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 35 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2012.
All research outputs
#21,186,729
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
#329
of 355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,007
of 170,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.