You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Calibration of Multiple In Silico Tools for Predicting Pathogenicity of Mismatch Repair Gene Missense Substitutions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Mutation, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/humu.22214 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bryony A. Thompson, Marc S. Greenblatt, Maxime P. Vallee, Johanna C. Herkert, Chloe Tessereau, Erin L. Young, Ivan A. Adzhubey, Biao Li, Russell Bell, Bingjian Feng, Sean D. Mooney, Predrag Radivojac, Shamil R. Sunyaev, Thierry Frebourg, Robert M.W. Hofstra, Rolf H. Sijmons, Ken Boucher, Alun Thomas, David E. Goldgar, Amanda B. Spurdle, Sean V. Tavtigian |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| India | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 101 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 30 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 11 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 20% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 13 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2020.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Human Mutation
#1,118
of 3,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,897
of 205,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Mutation
#11
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,048 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.