↓ Skip to main content

Density-functional-based tight-binding parameterization of Mo, C, H, O and Si for studying hydrogenation reactions on molybdenum carbide

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Density-functional-based tight-binding parameterization of Mo, C, H, O and Si for studying hydrogenation reactions on molybdenum carbide
Published in
Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00214-016-1920-y
Authors

Xingchen Liu, Mohammad Wahiduzzaman, Augusto F. Oliveira, Thomas Heine, Dennis R. Salahub

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 37%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 7 37%
Chemical Engineering 2 11%
Physics and Astronomy 2 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 4 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2016.
All research outputs
#16,042,980
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical Chemistry Accounts
#379
of 581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,340
of 357,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical Chemistry Accounts
#7
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 581 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.