↓ Skip to main content

Predicting Perceptual Decision Biases from Early Brain Activity

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroscience, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
250 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predicting Perceptual Decision Biases from Early Brain Activity
Published in
Journal of Neuroscience, September 2012
DOI 10.1523/jneurosci.1708-12.2012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefan Bode, David K. Sewell, Simon Lilburn, Jason D. Forte, Philip L. Smith, Jutta Stahl

Abstract

Perceptual decision making is believed to be driven by the accumulation of sensory evidence following stimulus encoding. More controversially, some studies report that neural activity preceding the stimulus also affects the decision process. We used a multivariate pattern classification approach for the analysis of the human electroencephalogram (EEG) to decode choice outcomes in a perceptual decision task from spatially and temporally distributed patterns of brain signals. When stimuli provided discriminative information, choice outcomes were predicted by neural activity following stimulus encoding; when stimuli provided no discriminative information, choice outcomes were predicted by neural activity preceding the stimulus. Moreover, in the absence of discriminative information, the recent choice history primed the choices on subsequent trials. A diffusion model fitted to the choice probabilities and response time distributions showed that the starting point of the evidence accumulation process was shifted toward the previous choice, consistent with the hypothesis that choice priming biases the accumulation process toward a decision boundary. This bias is reflected in prestimulus brain activity, which, in turn, becomes predictive of future decisions. Our results provide a model of how non-stimulus-driven decision making in humans could be accomplished on a neural level.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 3%
France 4 2%
Netherlands 3 1%
Switzerland 3 1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 222 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 28%
Researcher 51 20%
Student > Master 35 14%
Student > Bachelor 23 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 4%
Other 36 14%
Unknown 25 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 97 39%
Neuroscience 34 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 4%
Engineering 10 4%
Other 25 10%
Unknown 40 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2016.
All research outputs
#7,488,535
of 24,143,470 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroscience
#11,331
of 23,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,212
of 171,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroscience
#120
of 333 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,143,470 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,709 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 333 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.