↓ Skip to main content

The Impact of Social Support on Outcomes in Adult Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Current Diabetes Reports, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
340 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
413 Mendeley
Title
The Impact of Social Support on Outcomes in Adult Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review
Published in
Current Diabetes Reports, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11892-012-0317-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joni L. Strom, Leonard E. Egede

Abstract

Diabetes is one of the fastest growing chronic diseases globally and in the United States. Although preventable, type 2 diabetes accounts for 90 % of all cases of diabetes worldwide and continues to be a source of increased disability, lost productivity, mortality, and amplified health-care costs. Proper disease management is crucial for achieving better diabetes-related outcomes. Evidence suggests that higher levels of social support are associated with improved clinical outcomes, reduced psychosocial symptomatology, and the adaptation of beneficial lifestyle activities; however, the role of social support in diabetes management is not well understood. The purpose of this systematic review is to examine the impact of social support on outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 413 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 406 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 58 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 14%
Student > Master 56 14%
Student > Bachelor 47 11%
Student > Postgraduate 23 6%
Other 70 17%
Unknown 102 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 90 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 62 15%
Social Sciences 44 11%
Psychology 34 8%
Computer Science 11 3%
Other 53 13%
Unknown 119 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,142,973
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Current Diabetes Reports
#51
of 1,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,546
of 187,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Diabetes Reports
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,054 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.