↓ Skip to main content

Arbuscular mycorrhizal infection changes the bacterial 16 S rDNA community composition in the rhizosphere of maize

Overview of attention for article published in Mycorrhiza, October 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
Arbuscular mycorrhizal infection changes the bacterial 16 S rDNA community composition in the rhizosphere of maize
Published in
Mycorrhiza, October 2001
DOI 10.1007/s00572-001-0136-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

P. Marschner, D. Crowley, R. Lieberei

Abstract

Mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal (NM) maize plants were grown for 4 or 7 weeks in an autoclaved quartz sand-soil mix. Half of the NM plants were supplied with soluble P (NM-HP) while the other half (NM-LP), like the mycorrhizal plants, received poorly soluble Fe and Al phosphate. The mycorrhizal plants were inoculated with Glomus mosseae or G. intraradices. Soil bacteria and those associated with the mycorrhizal inoculum were reintroduced by adding a filtrate of a low P soil and of the inocula. At 4 and 7 weeks, plants were harvested and root samples were taken from the root tip (0-1 cm), the subapical zone (1-2 cm) and the mature root zone at the site of lateral root emergence. DNA was extracted from the roots with adhering soil. At both harvests, the NM-HP plants had higher shoot dry weight than the plants grown on poorly soluble P. Mycorrhizal infection of both fungi ranged between 78% and 93% and had no effect on shoot growth or shoot P content. Eubacterial community compositions were examined by polymerase chain reaction-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of 16 S rDNA, digitisation of the band patterns and multivariate analysis. The community composition changed with time and was root zone specific. The differences in bacterial community composition in the rhizosphere between the NM plants and the mycorrhizal plants were greater at 7 than at 4 weeks. The two fungi had similar bacterial communities after 4 weeks, but these differed after 7 weeks. The observed differences are probably due to changes in substrate composition and amount in the rhizosphere.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Poland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 96 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 31%
Researcher 21 21%
Student > Master 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 14 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 57%
Environmental Science 13 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Engineering 2 2%
Physics and Astronomy 1 <1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 18 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2012.
All research outputs
#20,166,700
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from Mycorrhiza
#512
of 647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,836
of 43,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mycorrhiza
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 647 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 43,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them