You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Landscape‐scale restoration minimizes tree growth vulnerability to 21st century drought in a dry forest
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Applications, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/eap.2238 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John B. Bradford, Caitlin M. Andrews, Marcos D. Robles, Lisa A. McCauley, Travis J. Woolley, Robert M. Marshall |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 71% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 25% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 19 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 15 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 14% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 23 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2020.
All research outputs
#7,015,960
of 24,699,496 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#1,622
of 3,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,269
of 518,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#15
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,699,496 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.