You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Topographic, soil, and climate drivers of drought sensitivity in forests and shrublands of the Pacific Northwest, USA
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-020-75273-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer M. Cartwright, Caitlin E. Littlefield, Julia L. Michalak, Joshua J. Lawler, Solomon Z. Dobrowski |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 63% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 23 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 29 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 17% |
| Engineering | 7 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 29 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2020.
All research outputs
#5,726,261
of 23,506,079 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#39,121
of 127,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,095
of 421,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,554
of 4,751 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,506,079 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 127,108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,751 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.