You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
From textual to visual: the use of concept mapping as an analytical tool in a grounded theory study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Qualitative Research, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1177/1468794120965362 |
| Authors |
Titan Ligita, Intansari Nurjannah, Kristin Wicking, Nichole Harvey, Karen Francis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Ireland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Researcher | 5 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 40 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 14 | 16% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 40 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2022.
All research outputs
#14,532,311
of 23,709,010 outputs
Outputs from Qualitative Research
#467
of 686 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,895
of 422,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Qualitative Research
#16
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,709,010 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 686 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.