| Title |
Comparative analysis of China’s Health Code, Australia’s COVIDSafe and New Zealand’s COVID Tracer Surveillance Apps: a new corona of public health governmentality?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Media International Australia, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1177/1329878x20968277 |
| Authors |
Fan Yang, Luke Heemsbergen, Robbie Fordyce |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 9 | 45% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 55% |
| Scientists | 7 | 35% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 94 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 38 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 21 | 22% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 10% |
| Arts and Humanities | 7 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 38 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,995,864
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Media International Australia
#121
of 678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,782
of 440,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Media International Australia
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 678 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.