You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Differences in Neonicotinoid and Metabolite Sorption to Activated Carbon Are Driven by Alterations to the Insecticidal Pharmacophore
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Science & Technology, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1021/acs.est.0c04187 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Danielle T. Webb, Matthew R. Nagorzanski, Megan M. Powers, David M. Cwiertny, Michelle L. Hladik, Gregory H. LeFevre |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Thailand | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 22% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 4% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Researcher | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 26 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 5 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 28 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2020.
All research outputs
#17,297,846
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#16,841
of 20,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#277,795
of 440,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#201
of 277 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,684 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 277 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.