| Title |
Intuition and evidence--uneasy bedfellows?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, May 2002
|
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Trisha Greenhalgh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 16 | 33% |
| Spain | 6 | 12% |
| Australia | 3 | 6% |
| United States | 3 | 6% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 16 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 51% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 24% |
| Scientists | 9 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 161 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 12% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 53 | 31% |
| Unknown | 19 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 39% |
| Social Sciences | 29 | 17% |
| Psychology | 10 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 14% |
| Unknown | 26 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2024.
All research outputs
#751,061
of 25,632,496 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#324
of 4,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#551
of 127,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,632,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,919 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.