↓ Skip to main content

The challenge of pouch-vaginal fistulas: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Techniques in Coloproctology, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
The challenge of pouch-vaginal fistulas: a systematic review
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10151-012-0885-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Maslekar, P. M. Sagar, D. Harji, C. Bruce, B. Griffiths

Abstract

Pouch-vaginal fistulae affect 6% of women after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Such fistulae significantly impact on the patient's quality of life and present a technical challenge to the surgeon. Although several operative approaches have been described, results from a number of case series are variable and associated with significant rates of failure. As a result, there remains a lack of consensus in the literature with regard to the management of this troublesome problem. The purpose of this article is to review the results of surgical intervention and to provide a clinical algorithm that gives a structured approach to the management of pouch-vaginal fistulae.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 7 22%
Unknown 7 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 53%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 6%
Psychology 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 6 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2023.
All research outputs
#7,652,891
of 23,299,593 outputs
Outputs from Techniques in Coloproctology
#711
of 1,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,805
of 170,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Techniques in Coloproctology
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,299,593 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.