↓ Skip to main content

Peer Victimization in Childhood and Internalizing Problems in Adolescence: A Prospective Longitudinal Study

Overview of attention for article published in Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
209 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
372 Mendeley
Title
Peer Victimization in Childhood and Internalizing Problems in Adolescence: A Prospective Longitudinal Study
Published in
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10802-012-9678-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karolina Zwierzynska, Dieter Wolke, Tanya S. Lereya

Abstract

Traumatic childhood experiences have been found to predict later internalizing problems. This prospective longitudinal study investigated whether repeated and intentional harm doing by peers (peer victimization) in childhood predicts internalizing symptoms in early adolescence. 3,692 children from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC), as well as their mothers and teachers, reported on bullying in childhood (7-10 years) and internalizing problems in early adolescence (11-14 years). Controlling for prior psychopathology, family adversity, gender and IQ, being a victim of bullying was associated with higher overall scores, as well as increased odds of scoring in the severe range (>90(th) percentile) for emotional and depression symptoms. Victims were also more likely to show persistent depression symptoms over a 2-year period. These associations were found independent of whether mothers, teachers or the children reported on bullying. It is concluded that peer victimization in childhood is a precursor of both short-lived and persistent internalizing symptoms, underlining the importance of environmental factors such as peer relationships in the etiology of internalizing problems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 372 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Puerto Rico 1 <1%
Unknown 366 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 80 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 15%
Student > Bachelor 46 12%
Researcher 35 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 7%
Other 48 13%
Unknown 83 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 153 41%
Social Sciences 41 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 4%
Neuroscience 11 3%
Other 29 8%
Unknown 99 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,591,005
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#136
of 2,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,830
of 186,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.