↓ Skip to main content

Noncoding RNA in development

Overview of attention for article published in Mammalian Genome, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
404 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
393 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
Title
Noncoding RNA in development
Published in
Mammalian Genome, October 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00335-008-9136-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paulo P. Amaral, John S. Mattick

Abstract

Non-protein-coding sequences increasingly dominate the genomes of multicellular organisms as their complexity increases, in contrast to protein-coding genes, which remain relatively static. Most of the mammalian genome and indeed that of all eukaryotes is expressed in a cell- and tissue-specific manner, and there is mounting evidence that much of this transcription is involved in the regulation of differentiation and development. Different classes of small and large noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) have been shown to regulate almost every level of gene expression, including the activation and repression of homeotic genes and the targeting of chromatin-remodeling complexes. ncRNAs are involved in developmental processes in both simple and complex eukaryotes, and we illustrate this in the latter by focusing on the animal germline, brain, and eye. While most have yet to be systematically studied, the emerging evidence suggests that there is a vast hidden layer of regulatory ncRNAs that constitutes the majority of the genomic programming of multicellular organisms and plays a major role in controlling the epigenetic trajectories that underlie their ontogeny.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 393 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 2%
Norway 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 367 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 89 23%
Researcher 78 20%
Student > Master 51 13%
Student > Bachelor 34 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 24 6%
Other 66 17%
Unknown 51 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 181 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 95 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 4%
Chemistry 8 2%
Neuroscience 7 2%
Other 28 7%
Unknown 57 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2018.
All research outputs
#4,573,063
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from Mammalian Genome
#132
of 1,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,807
of 89,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mammalian Genome
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,124 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them