You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Clinical features of bladder cancer in primary care
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, September 2012
|
DOI | 10.3399/bjgp12x654560 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Elizabeth A Shephard, Sally Stapley, Richard D Neal, Peter Rose, Fiona M Walter, William T Hamilton |
Abstract |
Bladder cancer accounts for over 150,000 deaths worldwide. No screening is available, so diagnosis depends on investigations of symptoms. Of these, only visible haematuria has been studied in primary care. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 145 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 24 | 17% |
Student > Master | 18 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 11% |
Other | 14 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
Other | 24 | 17% |
Unknown | 38 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 37% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 6% |
Psychology | 5 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
Other | 19 | 13% |
Unknown | 50 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,554,572
of 24,137,435 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#789
of 4,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,450
of 172,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#4
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,137,435 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.