↓ Skip to main content

Clinical features of bladder cancer in primary care

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical features of bladder cancer in primary care
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, September 2012
DOI 10.3399/bjgp12x654560
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth A Shephard, Sally Stapley, Richard D Neal, Peter Rose, Fiona M Walter, William T Hamilton

Abstract

Bladder cancer accounts for over 150,000 deaths worldwide. No screening is available, so diagnosis depends on investigations of symptoms. Of these, only visible haematuria has been studied in primary care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 145 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 17%
Student > Master 18 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 11%
Other 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 38 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 6%
Psychology 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 50 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,554,572
of 24,137,435 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#789
of 4,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,450
of 172,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#4
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,137,435 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.