Title |
Intraoperative assessment of esophagogastric junction distensibility during per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal motility disorders
|
---|---|
Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, September 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00464-012-2484-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Erwin Rieder, Lee L. Swanström, Silvana Perretta, Johannes Lenglinger, Martin Riegler, Christy M. Dunst |
Abstract |
Per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a novel treatment for esophageal motility disorders such as achalasia. To date, the extent of the myotomy has been determined based on the subjective assessment of the endoscopist. We hypothesized that the real-time measurement of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) distensibility using a novel functional lumen-imaging probe would enable objective evaluation of POEM. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ireland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 39 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 25% |
Other | 5 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 13% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 8% |
Other | 7 | 18% |
Unknown | 5 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 68% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
Chemistry | 1 | 3% |
Engineering | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 9 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2012.
All research outputs
#15,251,053
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#3,772
of 5,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,938
of 169,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#57
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,994 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.