↓ Skip to main content

A cost-utility analysis of nursing intervention via telephone follow-up for injured road users

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
A cost-utility analysis of nursing intervention via telephone follow-up for injured road users
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, June 2009
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-9-98
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carin Franzén, Ulf Björnstig, Christine Brulin, Lars Lindholm

Abstract

Traffic injuries can cause physical, psychological, and economical impairment, and affected individuals may also experience shortcomings in their post-accident care and treatment. In an earlier randomised controlled study of nursing intervention via telephone follow-up, self-ratings of health-related quality of life were generally higher in the intervention group than in the control group.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 71 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 17%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 21 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 17%
Psychology 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 21 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2012.
All research outputs
#15,251,053
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#5,521
of 7,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,619
of 112,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#20
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.