↓ Skip to main content

Quantitative trait loci for maysin synthesis in maize (Zea mays L.) lines selected for high silk maysin content

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical and Applied Genetics, May 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Quantitative trait loci for maysin synthesis in maize (Zea mays L.) lines selected for high silk maysin content
Published in
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, May 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00122-007-0548-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. D. F. Meyer, M. E. Snook, K. E. Houchins, B. G. Rector, N. W. Widstrom, M. D. McMullen

Abstract

Maysin is a naturally occurring C-glycosyl flavone found in maize (Zea mays L.) silk tissue that confers resistance to corn earworm (Helicoverpa zea, Boddie). Recently, two new maize populations were derived for high silk maysin. The two populations were named the exotic populations of maize (EPM) and the southern inbreds of maize (SIM). Quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis was employed to determine which loci were responsible for elevated maysin levels in inbred lines derived from the EPM and SIM populations. The candidate genes consistent with QTL position included the p (pericarp color), c2 (colorless2), whp1 (white pollen1) and in1 (intensifier1) loci. The role of these loci in controlling high maysin levels in silks was tested by expression analysis and use of the loci as genetic markers onto the QTL populations. These studies support p, c2 and whp1, but not in1, as loci controlling maysin. Through this study, we determined that the p locus regulates whp1 transcription and that increased maysin in these inbred lines was primarily due to alleles at both structural and regulatory loci promoting increased flux through the flavone pathway by increasing chalcone synthase activity.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Student > Master 4 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Professor 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 76%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Computer Science 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 3%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2012.
All research outputs
#3,460,684
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#377
of 3,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,376
of 73,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,565 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 73,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.