↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness and Cost of Atypical Versus Typical Antipsychotic Treatment in a Nationwide Cohort of Patients With Schizophrenia in Germany

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness and Cost of Atypical Versus Typical Antipsychotic Treatment in a Nationwide Cohort of Patients With Schizophrenia in Germany
Published in
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, October 2012
DOI 10.1097/jcp.0b013e318268ddc0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tom Stargardt, Marc-Andreas Edel, Andreas Ebert, Reinhard Busse, Georg Juckel, Christian A. Gericke

Abstract

This study investigates the effectiveness and cost of typical versus atypical antipsychotics in a nationwide German cohort of patients with schizophrenia. The study sample consisted of patients insured with 4 sickness funds (n = 8,610) who were followed up for 12 months after hospital discharge with a diagnosis of schizophrenia in 2003. Multivariate regression models were fitted to assess the relationship between outcome variables (rehospitalization, bed-days, prescriptions against adverse effects, cost) and medication type, sex, age, and severity. Severity was assessed by prior bed-days due to schizophrenia during 2000 to 2002. Risk of rehospitalization did not differ between groups but within each group severity (P = 0.0003). Males (P = 0.0016) and patients younger than 35 years (P < 0.0001) had a higher risk of rehospitalization. Number of bed-days was lower for treatment with typicals compared with atypicals (P < 0.0001); furthermore, bed-days depended on severity of disease (P < 0.0001). Prescriptions of drugs against extrapyramidal symptoms, anxiety, and agitation were higher for patients treated with typicals (P < 0.0001 for each). Mean predicted treatment cost per year was € 6442 for atypicals versus € 4443 for typicals (P < 0.0001). This study does not support unconditional superiority of atypicals over typicals, neither in terms of effectiveness nor in terms of cost.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Colombia 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 46 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 51%
Psychology 5 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 7 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2012.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology
#2,954
of 3,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,292
of 190,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology
#31
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,101 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.