| Title |
Ethical Aspects of Computational Neuroscience
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neuroethics, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12152-012-9163-7 |
| Authors |
Tyler D. Bancroft |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 16% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 5 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 22% |
| Unknown | 5 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2014.
All research outputs
#2,901,143
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from Neuroethics
#191
of 416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,733
of 164,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroethics
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.