You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Glassware design and drinking behaviours: a review of impact and mechanisms using a new typology of drinking behaviours
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Psychology Review, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1080/17437199.2020.1842230 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tess Langfield, Rachel Pechey, Mark A. Pilling, Theresa M. Marteau |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 33% |
| United States | 2 | 8% |
| Kenya | 1 | 4% |
| Finland | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 58% |
| Scientists | 7 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 18% |
| Researcher | 3 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 4 | 14% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 18% |
| Unknown | 10 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2022.
All research outputs
#2,081,126
of 23,189,371 outputs
Outputs from Health Psychology Review
#136
of 327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,840
of 505,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Psychology Review
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,189,371 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 505,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.