Title |
Sleep quality of mechanically ventilated patients sedated with dexmedetomidine
|
---|---|
Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, September 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00134-012-2685-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jun Oto, Katsunori Yamamoto, Shigefumi Koike, Mutsuo Onodera, Hideaki Imanaka, Masaji Nishimura |
Abstract |
Dexmedetomidine is thought to activate an endogenous pathway that naturally promotes non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep. Dexmedetomidine may induce restorative sleep, that is, NREM stage 3 and 4 (slow wave sleep; SWS) or sleep continuity in mechanically ventilated patients. Few data have been published, however, on the sleep characteristics of mechanically ventilated patients during dexmedetomidine infusion. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 33% |
Japan | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | 1% |
France | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 95 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 16 | 16% |
Researcher | 13 | 13% |
Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 11% |
Professor | 10 | 10% |
Other | 22 | 22% |
Unknown | 15 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 61% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 10% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
Psychology | 2 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 3% |
Unknown | 19 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2016.
All research outputs
#13,416,484
of 23,630,563 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#3,711
of 5,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,725
of 170,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#21
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,630,563 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.4. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.