You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
NCKAP1 Disruptive Variants Lead to a Neurodevelopmental Disorder with Core Features of Autism
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Human Genetics, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.10.002 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hui Guo, Qiumeng Zhang, Rujia Dai, Bin Yu, Kendra Hoekzema, Jieqiong Tan, Senwei Tan, Xiangbin Jia, Wendy K Chung, Rebecca Hernan, Fowzan S Alkuraya, Ahood Alsulaiman, Mohammad A Al-Muhaizea, Gaetan Lesca, Linda Pons, Audrey Labalme, Linda Laux, Emily Bryant, Natasha J Brown, Elena Savva, Samantha Ayres, Dhamidhu Eratne, Hilde Peeters, Frédéric Bilan, Lucile Letienne-Cejudo, Brigitte Gilbert-Dussardier, Inge-Lore Ruiz-Arana, Jenny Meylan Merlini, Alexia Boizot, Lucia Bartoloni, Federico Santoni, Danielle Karlowicz, Marie McDonald, Huidan Wu, Zhengmao Hu, Guodong Chen, Jianjun Ou, Charlotte Brasch-Andersen, Christina R Fagerberg, Inken Dreyer, Anne Chun-Hui Tsai, Valerie Slegesky, Rose B McGee, Brina Daniels, Elizabeth A Sellars, Lori A Carpenter, Bradley Schaefer, Maria J Guillen Sacoto, Amber Begtrup, Rhonda E Schnur, Sumit Punj, Ingrid M Wentzensen, Lindsay Rhodes, Qian Pan, Raphael A Bernier, Chao Chen, Evan E Eichler, Kun Xia |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 27 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Psychology | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Unknown | 28 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2020.
All research outputs
#5,415,901
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Human Genetics
#2,405
of 5,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,838
of 442,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Human Genetics
#33
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,911 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.