↓ Skip to main content

Effects of modafinil on non-verbal cognition, task enjoyment and creative thinking in healthy volunteers

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropharmacology, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 4,817)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
33 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
2 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
397 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of modafinil on non-verbal cognition, task enjoyment and creative thinking in healthy volunteers
Published in
Neuropharmacology, July 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.07.009
Pubmed ID
Authors

U. Müller, J.B. Rowe, T. Rittman, C. Lewis, T.W. Robbins, B.J. Sahakian

Abstract

Modafinil, a putative cognitive enhancing drug, has previously been shown to improve performance of healthy volunteers as well as patients with attention deficit disorder and schizophrenia, mainly in tests of executive functions. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of modafinil on non-verbal cognitive functions in healthy volunteers, with a particular focus on variations of cognitive load, measures of motivational factors and the effects on creative problem-solving.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 397 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 379 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 92 23%
Student > Master 53 13%
Researcher 48 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 11%
Other 21 5%
Other 68 17%
Unknown 70 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 93 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 58 15%
Neuroscience 35 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 9%
Social Sciences 15 4%
Other 76 19%
Unknown 86 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 195. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2023.
All research outputs
#203,169
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Neuropharmacology
#25
of 4,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#889
of 177,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropharmacology
#2
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,817 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.