You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exploring factors associated with participation in citizen science among UK museum visitors aged 40–60: A qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework and the capability opportunity motivation-behaviour model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Public Understanding of Science, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1177/0963662520963511 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wan Kam, Muki Haklay, Julia Lorke |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 45% |
| Italy | 1 | 9% |
| Australia | 1 | 9% |
| South Africa | 1 | 9% |
| Germany | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 9% |
| Researcher | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 24 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 11 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 26 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2020.
All research outputs
#4,156,271
of 23,262,131 outputs
Outputs from Public Understanding of Science
#432
of 1,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,241
of 420,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Understanding of Science
#9
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,262,131 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.