You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Persistent fatigue following SARS-CoV-2 infection is common and independent of severity of initial infection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0240784 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Liam Townsend, Adam H. Dyer, Karen Jones, Jean Dunne, Aoife Mooney, Fiona Gaffney, Laura O'Connor, Deirdre Leavy, Kate O'Brien, Joanne Dowds, Jamie A. Sugrue, David Hopkins, Ignacio Martin-Loeches, Cliona Ni Cheallaigh, Parthiban Nadarajan, Anne Marie McLaughlin, Nollaig M. Bourke, Colm Bergin, Cliona O'Farrelly, Ciaran Bannan, Niall Conlon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 749 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 188 | 25% |
| Austria | 21 | 3% |
| United States | 16 | 2% |
| Japan | 16 | 2% |
| France | 14 | 2% |
| Ireland | 13 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 9 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 7 | <1% |
| Belgium | 5 | <1% |
| Other | 33 | 4% |
| Unknown | 427 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 677 | 90% |
| Scientists | 37 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 23 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 12 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 882 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 882 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 109 | 12% |
| Researcher | 94 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 75 | 9% |
| Other | 50 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 44 | 5% |
| Other | 141 | 16% |
| Unknown | 369 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 221 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 64 | 7% |
| Psychology | 33 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 28 | 3% |
| Other | 97 | 11% |
| Unknown | 409 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1650. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2023.
All research outputs
#6,695
of 25,782,917 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#75
of 224,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#320
of 439,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3
of 2,931 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,931 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.