| Title |
Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 on mink farms between humans and mink and back to humans
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.abe5901 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bas B. Oude Munnink, Reina S. Sikkema, David F. Nieuwenhuijse, Robert Jan Molenaar, Emmanuelle Munger, Richard Molenkamp, Arco van der Spek, Paulien Tolsma, Ariene Rietveld, Miranda Brouwer, Noortje Bouwmeester-Vincken, Frank Harders, Renate Hakze-van der Honing, Marjolein C. A. Wegdam-Blans, Ruth J. Bouwstra, Corine GeurtsvanKessel, Annemiek A. van der Eijk, Francisca C. Velkers, Lidwien A. M. Smit, Arjan Stegeman, Wim H. M. van der Poel, Marion P. G. Koopmans |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,975 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 554 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 231 | 8% |
| Spain | 111 | 4% |
| Canada | 67 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 51 | 2% |
| France | 45 | 2% |
| Denmark | 43 | 1% |
| Japan | 37 | 1% |
| Germany | 29 | <1% |
| Other | 323 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1484 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2521 | 85% |
| Scientists | 288 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 99 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 66 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 739 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 739 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 104 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 86 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 70 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 57 | 8% |
| Other | 36 | 5% |
| Other | 124 | 17% |
| Unknown | 262 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 90 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 75 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 9% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 64 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 53 | 7% |
| Other | 104 | 14% |
| Unknown | 288 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3921. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,297
of 25,874,560 outputs
Outputs from Science
#76
of 83,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88
of 437,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#6
of 932 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,874,560 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,364 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,227 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 932 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.