↓ Skip to main content

Use and Perceptions of the Internet for Sexual Information and Partners: A Study of Young Men Who Have Sex with Men

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
Title
Use and Perceptions of the Internet for Sexual Information and Partners: A Study of Young Men Who Have Sex with Men
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, August 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10508-010-9666-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katrina Kubicek, Julie Carpineto, Bryce McDavitt, George Weiss, Michele D. Kipke

Abstract

The Internet has opened many doors with its accessibility to information, entertainment and web-based communities. For young men who have sex with men (YMSM), the Internet can provide access to information on relevant sexual behavior and health information, stories from other men about relationship issues, and a venue for locating potential sexual and dating partners. Understanding YMSM's motivations for going online for information, advice or sexual relationships, is important as the Internet becomes increasingly used not only as a space to find sexual partners, but also as a venue for HIV and STI interventions. Having an understanding of the risks associated with searching for partners online, and how and why YMSM use the Internet for a variety of purposes, can inform the development of more effective Internet-based risk reduction programs. This article presents qualitative and quantitative data from the Healthy Young Men's Study, a longitudinal study of an ethnically diverse cohort of 526 YMSM. Qualitative interviews (N = 24) described not only the prevalence of using the Internet for finding sexual partners and the possible benefits and risks associated with that practice, but also the processes and perceptions of using this mechanism. Our data indicate that YMSM used the Internet to find information related to sex and sexuality, seek friendships, sexual partners as well as "hook-ups" or casual sex. Findings were presented in relation to how YMSM researchers and interventionists can identify how to most effectively reach YMSM through online methods.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 123 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 16%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 25 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 37 28%
Psychology 32 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 8%
Arts and Humanities 4 3%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 28 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2012.
All research outputs
#12,667,580
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#2,439
of 3,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,376
of 94,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#13
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,445 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.