| Title |
Global Production Networks, Chronic Poverty and ‘Slave Labour’ in Brazil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Studies in Comparative International Development, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12116-012-9101-z |
| Authors |
Nicola Phillips, Leonardo Sakamoto |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 6 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 26 | 38% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 14% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 10% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 11 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,092,883
of 23,573,357 outputs
Outputs from Studies in Comparative International Development
#48
of 312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,093
of 164,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Studies in Comparative International Development
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,573,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.