↓ Skip to main content

「幸運」な事象は連続して起こるのか? : 「運資源ビリーフ」の観点から

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Social Psychology, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
「幸運」な事象は連続して起こるのか? : 「運資源ビリーフ」の観点から
Published in
Japanese Journal of Social Psychology, August 2009
DOI 10.14966/jssp.kj00005698865
Authors

村上 幸史

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 1 50%
Engineering 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2022.
All research outputs
#16,847,292
of 25,746,891 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Social Psychology
#192
of 296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,581
of 123,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Social Psychology
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,746,891 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.