You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Telephone-delivered health coaching improves anxiety outcomes after myocardial infarction: the ‘ProActive Heart’ trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1177/2047487312460515 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adrienne O’Neil, Anna L Hawkes, John J Atherton, Tania A Patrao, Kristy Sanderson, Rory Wolfe, C Barr Taylor, Brian Oldenburg |
| Abstract |
Recently, we found a telephone-delivered secondary prevention programme using health coaching ('ProActive Heart') to be effective in improving a range of key behavioural outcomes for myocardial infarction (MI) patients. What remains unclear, however, is the extent to which these treatment effects translate to important psychological outcomes such as depression and anxiety outcomes, an issue of clinical significance due to the substantial proportion of MI patients who experience depression and anxiety. The objective of the study was to investigate, as a secondary hypothesis of a larger trial, the effects of a telephone-delivered health coaching programme on depression and anxiety outcomes of MI patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 110 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 18% |
| Researcher | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 28 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 30 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 30 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2015.
All research outputs
#7,355,930
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
#1,320
of 2,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,364
of 186,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.