You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Defining the genotypic and phenotypic spectrum of X-linked MSL3-related disorder
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genetics in Medicine, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41436-020-00993-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Theresa Brunet, Kirsty McWalter, Katharina Mayerhanser, Grace M. Anbouba, Amy Armstrong-Javors, Ingrid Bader, Evan Baugh, Amber Begtrup, Caleb P. Bupp, Bert L. Callewaert, Anna Cereda, Margot A. Cousin, Juan C. Del Rey Jimenez, Laurie Demmer, Nikita R. Dsouza, Nicole Fleischer, Ralitza H. Gavrilova, Sumedha Ghate, Elisabeth Graf, Andrew Green, Sarah R. Green, Maria Iascone, Ameni Kdissa, Dirk Klee, Eric W. Klee, Emily Lancaster, Kristin Lindstrom, Johannes A. Mayr, Meriel McEntagart, Naomi J. L. Meeks, Dana Mittag, Harrison Moore, Anne K. Olsen, Damara Ortiz, Gretchen Parsons, Loren D. M. Pena, Richard E. Person, Sumit Punj, Gonzalo Alonso Ramos-Rivera, Maria J. Guillen Sacoto, G. Bradley Schaefer, Rhonda E. Schnur, Tiana M. Scott, Daryl A. Scott, Carolyn R. Serbinski, Vandana Shashi, Victoria M. Siu, Barbro Fossøy Stadheim, Jennifer A. Sullivan, Jana Švantnerová, Lea Velsher, David S. Wargowski, Ingrid M. Wentzensen, Dagmar Wieczorek, Juliane Winkelmann, Patrick Yap, Michael Zech, Michael T. Zimmermann, Thomas Meitinger, Felix Distelmaier, Matias Wagner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 60% |
| Belgium | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 16% |
| Researcher | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 14 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Psychology | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 14 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2021.
All research outputs
#7,783,733
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Genetics in Medicine
#1,923
of 2,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,316
of 434,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics in Medicine
#51
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,945 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.