↓ Skip to main content

Sedentary behavior: Understanding and influencing adults' prolonged sitting time

Overview of attention for article published in Preventive Medicine, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
22 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
142 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
259 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sedentary behavior: Understanding and influencing adults' prolonged sitting time
Published in
Preventive Medicine, September 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.08.024
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neville Owen

Abstract

Too much sitting is now understood to be a health risk that is additional to, and distinct from, too little exercise. There is a rapidly-accumulating evidence on relationships of prolonged sedentary time and patterns of sedentary time with cardio-metabolic risk biomarkers and health outcomes. There is, however, the need to gather dose-response evidence and develop a broader understanding of the set of mechanisms linking sedentary behavior to health outcomes. In addition to the further understanding of the associated health risks, there is a new health-behavior, and epidemiological and experimental research agenda to be pursued, which include measurement studies; understanding the relevant determinants-particularly environmental determinants of sedentary behavior; and, developing effective interventions. A broad-based body of evidence is needed to inform the research-translation agenda-identifying and developing the future public health initiatives, environmental and policy changes and clinical guidelines that may be required.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 248 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 18%
Student > Bachelor 28 11%
Researcher 21 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 8%
Other 44 17%
Unknown 46 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 17%
Sports and Recreations 42 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 14%
Psychology 19 7%
Social Sciences 19 7%
Other 40 15%
Unknown 60 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,247,596
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from Preventive Medicine
#557
of 5,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,269
of 187,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Preventive Medicine
#5
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,029 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.