You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Internet-Based Psychodynamic versus Cognitive Behavioral Guided Self-Help for Generalized Anxiety Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1159/000339371 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gerhard Andersson, Björn Paxling, Pie Roch-Norlund, Gunnar Östman, Anna Norgren, Jonas Almlöv, Lisa Georén, Elisabeth Breitholtz, Mats Dahlin, Pim Cuijpers, Per Carlbring, Farrell Silverberg |
| Abstract |
Guided Internet-based cognitive behavior therapy (ICBT) has been tested in many trials and found to be effective in the treatment of anxiety and mood disorders. Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) has also been treated with ICBT, but there are no controlled trials on guided Internet-based psychodynamic treatment (IPDT). Since there is preliminary support for psychodynamic treatment for GAD, we decided to test if a psychodynamically informed self-help treatment could be delivered via the Internet. The aim of the study was to investigate the efficacy of IPDT for GAD and to compare against ICBT and a waiting list control group. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 323 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 315 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 57 | 18% |
| Researcher | 47 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 7% |
| Other | 55 | 17% |
| Unknown | 56 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 179 | 55% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 6% |
| Unknown | 68 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2013.
All research outputs
#6,693,296
of 24,701,898 outputs
Outputs from Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
#534
of 1,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,063
of 175,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,701,898 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.