↓ Skip to main content

Features of 16,749 hospitalised UK patients with COVID-19 using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol

Overview of attention for article published in medRxiv, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 904)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
56 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
policy
6 policy sources
twitter
2316 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
363 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
654 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Features of 16,749 hospitalised UK patients with COVID-19 using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol
Published in
medRxiv, April 2020
DOI 10.1101/2020.04.23.20076042
Authors

Docherty, EM Harrison, CA Green, H Hardwick, R Pius, L Norman, KA Holden, JM Read, F Dondelinger, G Carson, L Merson, J Lee, D Plotkin, L Sigfrid, S Halpin, C Jackson, C Gamble, PW Horby, JS Nguyen-Van-Tam, ISARIC4C Investigators, J Dunning, PJM Openshaw, JK Baillie, Semple

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,316 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 654 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 654 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 86 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 9%
Other 54 8%
Student > Master 54 8%
Student > Bachelor 46 7%
Other 116 18%
Unknown 238 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 190 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 4%
Social Sciences 16 2%
Other 95 15%
Unknown 272 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1965. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2024.
All research outputs
#4,833
of 25,801,916 outputs
Outputs from medRxiv
#31
of 904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#343
of 409,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from medRxiv
#15
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,801,916 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 218.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.