You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development and Assessment of a Pooled Serum as Candidate Standard to Measure Influenza A Virus Group 1 Hemagglutinin Stalk-Reactive Antibodies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Vaccines, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3390/vaccines8040666 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Juan Manuel Carreño, Jacqueline U. McDonald, Tara Hurst, Peter Rigsby, Eleanor Atkinson, Lethia Charles, Raffael Nachbagauer, Mohammad Amin Behzadi, Shirin Strohmeier, Lynda Coughlan, Teresa Aydillo, Boerries Brandenburg, Adolfo García-Sastre, Krisztian Kaszas, Min Z. Levine, Alessandro Manenti, Adrian B. McDermott, Emanuele Montomoli, Leacky Muchene, Sandeep R. Narpala, Ranawaka A. P. M. Perera, Nadine C. Salisch, Sophie A. Valkenburg, Fan Zhou, Othmar G. Engelhardt, Florian Krammer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 27% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 68% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 14% |
| Scientists | 3 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 33% |
| Other | 3 | 20% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 33% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 33% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 1 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,563,607
of 23,924,883 outputs
Outputs from Vaccines
#583
of 3,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,580
of 421,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vaccines
#22
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,924,883 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,614 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.