↓ Skip to main content

Can domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) use referential emotional expressions to locate hidden food?

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
Title
Can domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) use referential emotional expressions to locate hidden food?
Published in
Animal Cognition, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10071-012-0560-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Buttelmann, Michael Tomasello

Abstract

Although many studies have investigated domestic dogs' (Canis familiaris) use of human communicative cues, little is known about their use of humans' emotional expressions. We conducted a study following the general paradigm of Repacholi in Dev Psychol 34:1017-1025, (1998) and tested four breeds of dogs in the laboratory and another breed in the open air. In our study, a human reacted emotionally (happy, neutral or disgust) to the hidden contents of two boxes, after which the dog was then allowed to choose one of the boxes. Dogs tested in the laboratory distinguished between the most distinct of the expressed emotions (Happy-Disgust condition) by choosing appropriately, but performed at chance level when the two emotions were less distinct (Happy-Neutral condition). The breed tested in the open air passed both conditions, but this breed's differing testing setup might have been responsible for their success. Although without meaningful emotional expressions, when given a choice, these subjects chose randomly, their performance did not differ from that in the experimental conditions. Based on the findings revealed in the laboratory, we suggest that some domestic dogs recognize both the directedness and the valence of some human emotional expressions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 2 1%
Germany 2 1%
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Austria 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 170 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 18%
Researcher 30 17%
Student > Master 28 15%
Student > Bachelor 26 14%
Other 10 6%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 25 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 34%
Psychology 52 29%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 11 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 3%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 34 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,054,733
of 24,456,171 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#252
of 1,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,829
of 171,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,456,171 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.