↓ Skip to main content

Pediatric tick-borne infections of the central nervous system in an endemic region of Sweden: a prospective evaluation of clinical manifestations

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Pediatric tick-borne infections of the central nervous system in an endemic region of Sweden: a prospective evaluation of clinical manifestations
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00431-011-1542-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mikael Sundin, Magnus E. A. Hansson, Mona-Lisa Engman, Claes Örvell, Lars Lindquist, Katarina Wide, Karl-Johan Lidefelt

Abstract

Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) and neuroborreliosis (NB) are well-known central nervous system (CNS) infections in children. Childhood tick-borne CNS infections are generally described as mild conditions. However, this view has recently been challenged, and the natural course, including potential sequelae, has been debated. If the diseases present with nonspecific symptoms and signs, some children may elude diagnosis. This study estimates the incidence of symptomatic tick-borne CNS infections in children under medical care and describes the spectrum of manifestations. One hundred twenty-four children with neurologic symptoms attending the Pediatric Emergency Department were included prospectively. Anti-TBE virus and anti-Borrelia serology results were analyzed together with inflammatory parameters in the blood and cerebrospinal fluid. Nearly one fourth of the children with neurologic symptoms were diagnosed with a tick-borne CNS infection (TBE, n = 10 [8%] and NB, n = 21 [16.8%]). In general, these children displayed an indistinct medical history and presented with nonspecific signs such as malaise/fatigue and headache. Diagnosis was based on analysis of acute and convalescent sera. Blood inflammatory parameters were nonspecific and did not contribute to the diagnostics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 18%
Other 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Librarian 4 9%
Other 11 24%
Unknown 8 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 13%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 11 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2021.
All research outputs
#4,149,754
of 22,914,829 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#859
of 3,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,702
of 121,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#6
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,914,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,730 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.