Title |
Krill oil versus fish oil in modulation of inflammation and lipid metabolism in mice transgenic for TNF-α
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Journal of Nutrition, August 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00394-012-0441-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Natalya Filipchuk Vigerust, Bodil Bjørndal, Pavol Bohov, Trond Brattelid, Asbjørn Svardal, Rolf Kristian Berge |
Abstract |
Biological effects of marine oils, fish oil (FO) and krill oil (KO), are mostly attributed to the high content of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFAs), predominantly eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). The study was aimed to investigate the influence of FO and KO on lipid homeostasis and inflammation in an animal model of persistent low-grade exposure to human tumor necrosis factor α (hTNF-α) and to evaluate whether these effects depend on the structural forms of EPA and DHA [triacylglycerols (TAG) vs. phospholipids]. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
Canada | 1 | 9% |
United States | 1 | 9% |
Netherlands | 1 | 9% |
Australia | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Norway | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 69 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 16 | 22% |
Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
Other | 16 | 22% |
Unknown | 10 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 31% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 15% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
Chemistry | 4 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 11% |
Unknown | 15 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,258,036
of 23,544,006 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#553
of 2,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,820
of 170,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#8
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,544,006 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,453 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.