| Title |
Canadian best practice recommendations for the management of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.191721 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christen Shoesmith, Agessandro Abrahao, Tim Benstead, Marvin Chum, Nicolas Dupre, Aaron Izenberg, Wendy Johnston, Sanjay Kalra, Desmond Leddin, Colleen O'Connell, Kerri Schellenberg, Anu Tandon, Lorne Zinman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 11 | 27% |
| Spain | 10 | 24% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 15 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 90% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
| Scientists | 1 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 140 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 11% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 10% |
| Researcher | 10 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 19% |
| Unknown | 52 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 6% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 58 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 114. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2023.
All research outputs
#360,588
of 25,085,000 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#643
of 9,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,661
of 418,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#16
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,085,000 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,373 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.