↓ Skip to main content

Feasibility study of real-time three-/four-dimensional ultrasound for epidural catheter insertion

Overview of attention for article published in BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Feasibility study of real-time three-/four-dimensional ultrasound for epidural catheter insertion
Published in
BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia, June 2011
DOI 10.1093/bja/aer157
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. Belavy, M.J. Ruitenberg, R.B. Brijball

Abstract

Real-time two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound can be used to facilitate neuraxial anaesthesia. Four-dimensional (4D) ultrasound allows the use of multiple imaging planes and three-dimensional reconstruction of ultrasound data. We assessed how 4D ultrasound could be used to perform epidural catheter insertion in a cadaver model. We then also compared 4D ultrasound and a previously described 2D technique in real-time epidural catheterization.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 2 4%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 48 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 17 33%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 73%
Engineering 3 6%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Chemistry 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 7 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2012.
All research outputs
#16,722,913
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia
#5,338
of 6,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,523
of 124,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia
#34
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,694 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.