You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of a predevelopment service delivery intervention: an application to improve clinical handovers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Quality & Safety, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001210 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guiqing Lily Yao, Nicola Novielli, Semira Manaseki-Holland, Yen-Fu Chen, Marcel van der Klink, Paul Barach, Peter J Chilton, Richard J Lilford |
| Abstract |
We developed a method to estimate the expected cost-effectiveness of a service intervention at the design stage and 'road-tested' the method on an intervention to improve patient handover of care between hospital and community. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 94 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 19% |
| Researcher | 17 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 16% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 21% |
| Unknown | 13 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 15% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 17% |
| Unknown | 18 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2012.
All research outputs
#15,090,466
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Quality & Safety
#2,217
of 2,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,749
of 187,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Quality & Safety
#29
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,552 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.9. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.