↓ Skip to main content

Rethinking the food security debate in Asia: some missing ecological and health dimensions and solutions

Overview of attention for article published in Food Security, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
Rethinking the food security debate in Asia: some missing ecological and health dimensions and solutions
Published in
Food Security, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12571-012-0211-2
Authors

Mark L. Wahlqvist, John McKay, Ya-Chen Chang, Ya-Wen Chiu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Philippines 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 86 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Student > Master 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 4%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 26 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 17 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 12%
Environmental Science 9 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 4%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 31 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2018.
All research outputs
#1,160,331
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Food Security
#80
of 830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,580
of 189,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food Security
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.