| Title |
Effect of high intensity intermittent training on heart rate variability in prepubescent children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, December 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00421-008-0955-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
François-Xavier Gamelin, Georges Baquet, Serge Berthoin, Delphine Thevenet, Cedric Nourry, Stéphane Nottin, Laurent Bosquet |
| Abstract |
The purpose of this study was to observe the effect of high intermittent exercise training on children's heart rate variability (HRV). Thirty-eight children (age 9.6 +/- 1.2 years) were divided into an intermittent (IT, n = 22) and a control group (CON, n = 16). At baseline and after a 7-week training period, HRV parameters, peak oxygen consumption (VO(2peak)) and maximal aerobic velocity (MAV) were assessed. Training consisted of three 30-min sessions composed by short maximal and supramaximal runs at velocities ranging from 100 up to 190% of MAV. HRV was computed in time and frequency domains. Training resulted in a significant increase in MAV and VO(2peak) in IT (P < 0.05) only without any significant change in HRV parameters for the two groups. Thus, 7 weeks of high intermittent exercise training allows to improve aerobic fitness. However, this modality of training was not sufficient enough to underline a possible effect on the heart rate autonomic regulation in children. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 378 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 359 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 70 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 56 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 8% |
| Researcher | 29 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 5% |
| Other | 82 | 22% |
| Unknown | 90 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 69 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 8% |
| Engineering | 28 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 80 | 21% |
| Unknown | 115 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2012.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#3,318
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,667
of 182,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#18
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.