↓ Skip to main content

STIMULATING DEBATE IN THE FIELD OF ADDICTION

Overview of attention for article published in Addiction, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
STIMULATING DEBATE IN THE FIELD OF ADDICTION
Published in
Addiction, January 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03717.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

ADRIAN CARTER, WAYNE HALL, POLLY AMBERMOON, NADEEKA DISSANAYAKA, JOHN O'SULLIVAN

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 17%
Unknown 5 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Other 1 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 67%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2012.
All research outputs
#16,801,619
of 24,712,008 outputs
Outputs from Addiction
#5,465
of 6,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,191
of 255,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Addiction
#54
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,712,008 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,115 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.7. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.