↓ Skip to main content

観血的および非観血的に治療した椎茸による食餌性イレウスの2例

Overview of attention for article published in Nihon Fukubu Kyukyu Igakkai Zasshi (Journal of Abdominal Emergency Medicine), November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
62 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
観血的および非観血的に治療した椎茸による食餌性イレウスの2例
Published in
Nihon Fukubu Kyukyu Igakkai Zasshi (Journal of Abdominal Emergency Medicine), November 2017
DOI 10.11231/jaem.37.1039
Authors

永岡 智之, 石田 直樹, 中川 祐輔, 梶原 伸介

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2023.
All research outputs
#931,767
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Fukubu Kyukyu Igakkai Zasshi (Journal of Abdominal Emergency Medicine)
#5
of 71 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,497
of 341,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Fukubu Kyukyu Igakkai Zasshi (Journal of Abdominal Emergency Medicine)
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 71 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them