↓ Skip to main content

Peptide-MHC-based nanovaccines for the treatment of autoimmunity: a “one size fits all” approach?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Medicine, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
18 patents
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
Peptide-MHC-based nanovaccines for the treatment of autoimmunity: a “one size fits all” approach?
Published in
Journal of Molecular Medicine, April 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00109-011-0757-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xavier Clemente-Casares, Sue Tsai, Yang Yang, Pere Santamaria

Abstract

Nanotechnology offers enormous potential in drug delivery and in vivo imaging. Nanoparticles (NPs), for example, are being extensively tested as scaffolds to deliver anti-cancer therapeutics or imaging tags. Our recent work, discussed herein, indicates that an opportunity exists to use NPs to deliver ligands for, and trigger, cognate receptors on T lymphocytes as a way to induce therapeutic immune responses in vivo. Specifically, systemic delivery of NPs coated with Type 1 diabetes (T1D)-relevant peptide-major histocompatibility complex molecules triggered the expansion of cognate memory autoregulatory (disease-suppressing) T cells, suppressed the progression of autoimmune attack against insulin-producing beta cells, and restored glucose homeostasis. This therapeutic avenue exploits a new paradigm in the progression of chronic autoimmune responses that enables the rational design of disease-specific "nanovaccines" capable of blunting autoimmunity without impairing systemic immunity, a long sought-after goal in the therapy of these disorders. Here, we discuss the research paths that led to the discovery of this therapeutic avenue and highlight the features that make it an attractive approach for the treatment, in an antigen-specific manner, of a whole host of autoimmune diseases.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 61 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 34%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Master 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 9 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 8%
Chemistry 4 6%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 10 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2022.
All research outputs
#3,130,386
of 23,377,816 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Medicine
#110
of 1,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,283
of 96,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Medicine
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,377,816 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,567 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.