↓ Skip to main content

Techniques to perform robotic left adrenalectomy in the obese patient

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Techniques to perform robotic left adrenalectomy in the obese patient
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00464-016-5049-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ajay V. Maker, Vijay K. Maker

Abstract

Minimally invasive adrenalectomy may be associated with reduction in postoperative pain, morbidity, and length of stay and, as a result, has become a preferred approach for many adrenal tumors. Left-sided adrenal tumors, however, are particularly challenging to address in the morbidly obese patient due to difficulties in maintaining exposure and dissection. The robotic platform offers instruments with greater degrees of freedom that aid in retraction and dissection, especially of the adrenal vein, but fixed patient positioning and the large distance needed between patient ports to avoid arm collisions can be restrictive in patients with a large amount of retroperitoneal fat and small working space. We demonstrate robotic left adrenalectomy (RLA) in a consecutive series of patients with a mean weight of 99 kg and mean BMI of 36. Techniques to safely and efficiently perform RLA in obese patients are stepwise demonstrated, including (1) Patient positioning, (2) Management of the pannus, (3) Customized port placement, (4) Medial retraction of the pancreas, (5) Finding the left adrenal vein, and (6) Management of bleeding. Intraoperative videos from multiple patients also show surgical pitfalls, examples of poor port placement, arm collisions, alternative approaches to the vein, and techniques to control unexpected bleeding. All patients in the series underwent successful RLA with negative margins, no major intra- or postoperative complications, and discharge on POD 12. Though poor exposure due to patient body habitus is a relative contraindication, even large left-sided adrenal tumors can be safely approached robotically while adhering to oncologic principles, as is demonstrated in this video.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 15%
Other 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 6 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Unknown 7 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2016.
All research outputs
#13,400,417
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#2,809
of 6,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,626
of 355,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#71
of 168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,056 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.